Inside Martin Margiela’s all-white maison / photo source
There are few schools of thought, philosophy, or design that have been so consistently reused and revisited as minimalism. Many times considered a blank sheet, a starting point from which everything originates and to which the designers return to renew and recharge, #minimalism has been recently exploited and labeled on every posted outfit or décor photo colored black or white. But minimalism in fashion is much more than the use of a single color or a trend of simplicity. It is an aesthetic that is deeply connected to a broader spectrum of social development and continuously reinvented and adapted to fit different eras.
COCO CHANEL and Serge Lifar, 1937: After the First World War, when the physically active lifestyle of women demanded new style, Coco Chanel reworked the traditional masculine wardrobe and created a more tailored capsule of separates for women, mainly in monochrome. / photo source
The term originates from the artistic movement that appeared in the 1960s in New York when a group of artists, including Donald Judd, John McCracken, Agnes Martin, and many others, “rejected the traditional representations in painting and sculpture and chose to pursue the new mode that owed as little as possible to the physical existence of an object”. Deriving from reductive aspects of Modernism, Judd described his work as “the simple expression of complex thought”, which sums up the aesthetic as it exists within fashion, too.
Minimalism was always an indicator of economic cycles and technological development. Looking back at the development of the 20th century, we can observe the minimalism underpinning almost every social development, even before the official start of the minimalist movement. From women entering the workforce to winning voting rights, the story of the modern working woman also mirrors the rise and fall of minimalism. The beginning of the more complex lifestyle was accompanied by simplified, masculine, and more practical clothing (take, for example, Chanel), while the backlashes against feminism in the 1950s and 1980s returned the hyper-feminine look (think Dior with his New Look) that was again overturned by avant-garde designers guided by reductivist mode.
In a fashion context, minimalism concentrates more on the form and fabric than on the function of the clothing. Through the process of reductivism, which strips the design object to its necessary elements, minimalist designers often play with lines and geometric shapes in a monochrome palette.
YOHJI YAMAMOTO brought to fashion a new sense of dimension that featured asymmetrical lines and considered the wearer’s body in the round rather than head to toe. / photo source
Moulded and pleated clothing by ISSEY MIYAKE explores the space around the wearer as well as within the pieces. / photo source
Early minimalism in art rejected the tradition of craftsmanship and rather opted for raw materials. In the 1980s, Japanese designers like Issey Miyake, Yohji Yamamoto, and Rei Kawakubo followed a similar path by sending down the runway clothing in unconventional fabrics like polyester, PVC, Lycra, etc., with baggy silhouettes and layering of distressed fabrics, not often found in Western fashion, characterized by elegance and the artisanal craftsmanship of haute couture.
The minimalism of this decade was also a way of escaping gender stereotypes. It removed the idea of gender by covering up or revealing the body in new ways and challenging traditional perceptions of sexiness. The impact of the Japanese designers on the minimalism movement was substantial; they provided a politically relevant alternative to the glitz and glamour of the decade and revolutionized the way we view clothes once and for all.
Renowned for her desire to push the boundaries of wearability and challenge modern perceptions of femininity, REI KAWAKUBO (Comme de Garçons) in 1997 created the collection, entitled “Body Meets Dress, Dress Meets Body”, that challenged traditional perceptions of the female body, often sexualized in Western cultures.
While fashion in the 1980s was divided between the so-called bourgeois and the avant-garde, two very different types of minimalism emerged. The large designer houses, such as Donna Karan and Armani, opted for chic and clean purism, while emerging designers and smaller labels continued by moving minimalism into a more conceptual direction. The next stage of minimalism was born: deconstructionism. Reducing the garment to its most fundamental parts would be the most basic understanding of the concept. And its pioneer? One and only, Martin Margiela.
Maison Martin Margiela became known for its definitive deconstruction and transformation techniques, where volumes are reinvented, shapes are modified, and garments’ original use and movement are playfully turned on their heads. Margiela’s vision was always to maintain the focus on the clothes. As fashion became more concerned with labels and branding, his work became even more relevant, not only for its technical brilliance and new take on feminine elegance but also for its anti-fashion values and anti-status symbolism.
The anonymity of the design and of the designer himself was key to MAISON MARGIELA’s aesthetic. The designer decided to remain anonymous throughout his whole career and refused to give interviews or take a bow at the end of his shows. He also often sent models down the catwalk with covered faces or walking backwards to keep the attention on the clothes.
While avant-garde designers had already embraced “power dressing” and resorted to minimalism, mainstream fashion followed in the late 1980s and 1990s, with American designers like Donna Karan and Calvin Klein taking the lead. Design directives: comfort, ease, and practicality for modern working women. So-called post-minimalism was a far cry from the power look of the previous decade, and unlike the European (Maison Martin Margiela, Ann Demeulemeester, Helmut Lang) and Japanese (Comme des Garcons, Issey Miyake) versions of minimalism of the 1990s, it focused more than ever on the female body than on the clothes themselves.
HUSSEIN CHALAYAN s/s 1998: Chalayan re-evaluated traditional womenswear by playing with proportions and reducing clothes to bare minimum. / photo source
In the late 1990s, there again arose an attachment to adroginity. Hussein Chalayan’s intellectual, scientific approach to fashion brought a transfomative and futuristic aspect to minimalism that was more concerned with what the body can achieve than how it looks.
HAIDER ACKERMANN: Fluid, draped shapes in satin, silk and leather are distinctive of Ackermann’s minimalism. / photo source 1 & 2
And minimalism today? In 2007, it became increasingly evident that the financial system was becoming unstable, a crash was unavoidable, and fashion buying habits were ready to change again. While minimalism in the past was always connected to various social, political, and cultural shifts, the movement of the 21st century is more impacted by economics. We have less money to spend on clothing and want to spend it on pieces that won’t be outdated by next season, and looking at these photos, it simply seems that minimal pieces always stay contemporary. We are also more concerned with ethical aspects of fashion as well as environmental issues such as the use of natural resources, waste, and pollution. Minimalism became a responsible way of fashion consumption and aesthetics that pervades the current fashion consciousness, with designers such as Stella McCartney, Phoebe Philo for Celine, Haider Ackermann, or high-street brands such as COS and Uniqlo leading the way.
Subscribe to our newsletter to instantly receive 15% off your first order and be the first to discover emerging designers, new arrivals, special offers and cool stuff like that!
In the recent days we've woken up to the new reality. The world is in a state of fear and uncertainty that is stressful and overwhelming for all of us. We kept it pretty quiet on the utopiast's channels for the last couple of days since we wanted to take time to contemplate what is [...]
Prepare to make the most of longer, warmer days with our new arrivals that shine especially when the sun comes out. We have brought together timeless, classic shapes and neutral tones by our independent designers and brands that will allow you to combine them in infinite ways depending on the context. 05 studio Based in [...]
»The starting point and the concept of the collection WITCHES LOOKBOOK was formed and based on the foundation of correlation between the city and the forest, which in symbolic language represent the conscious and subconscious, imaginative mind«, Janja Videc describes her latest collection Witches Lookbook. Through the collection she tells the story of a modern, [...]
Milano design week is one of the biggest and most important fairs in the trade. It has been around since 1961, with the original focus on Italian furniture. The trade show grew in size and diversity over the years. Design week can be roughly divided in two main events. The ‘Salone del Mobile’ and ‘Fuorisalone’ [...]
Quiet but Powerful: Minimalism in Fashion
Inside Martin Margiela’s all-white maison / photo source
There are few schools of thought, philosophy, or design that have been so consistently reused and revisited as minimalism. Many times considered a blank sheet, a starting point from which everything originates and to which the designers return to renew and recharge, #minimalism has been recently exploited and labeled on every posted outfit or décor photo colored black or white. But minimalism in fashion is much more than the use of a single color or a trend of simplicity. It is an aesthetic that is deeply connected to a broader spectrum of social development and continuously reinvented and adapted to fit different eras.
COCO CHANEL and Serge Lifar, 1937: After the First World War, when the physically active lifestyle of women demanded new style, Coco Chanel reworked the traditional masculine wardrobe and created a more tailored capsule of separates for women, mainly in monochrome. / photo source
The term originates from the artistic movement that appeared in the 1960s in New York when a group of artists, including Donald Judd, John McCracken, Agnes Martin, and many others, “rejected the traditional representations in painting and sculpture and chose to pursue the new mode that owed as little as possible to the physical existence of an object”. Deriving from reductive aspects of Modernism, Judd described his work as “the simple expression of complex thought”, which sums up the aesthetic as it exists within fashion, too.
Minimalism was always an indicator of economic cycles and technological development. Looking back at the development of the 20th century, we can observe the minimalism underpinning almost every social development, even before the official start of the minimalist movement. From women entering the workforce to winning voting rights, the story of the modern working woman also mirrors the rise and fall of minimalism. The beginning of the more complex lifestyle was accompanied by simplified, masculine, and more practical clothing (take, for example, Chanel), while the backlashes against feminism in the 1950s and 1980s returned the hyper-feminine look (think Dior with his New Look) that was again overturned by avant-garde designers guided by reductivist mode.
In a fashion context, minimalism concentrates more on the form and fabric than on the function of the clothing. Through the process of reductivism, which strips the design object to its necessary elements, minimalist designers often play with lines and geometric shapes in a monochrome palette.
YOHJI YAMAMOTO brought to fashion a new sense of dimension that featured asymmetrical lines and considered the wearer’s body in the round rather than head to toe. / photo source
Moulded and pleated clothing by ISSEY MIYAKE explores the space around the wearer as well as within the pieces. / photo source
Early minimalism in art rejected the tradition of craftsmanship and rather opted for raw materials. In the 1980s, Japanese designers like Issey Miyake, Yohji Yamamoto, and Rei Kawakubo followed a similar path by sending down the runway clothing in unconventional fabrics like polyester, PVC, Lycra, etc., with baggy silhouettes and layering of distressed fabrics, not often found in Western fashion, characterized by elegance and the artisanal craftsmanship of haute couture.
The minimalism of this decade was also a way of escaping gender stereotypes. It removed the idea of gender by covering up or revealing the body in new ways and challenging traditional perceptions of sexiness. The impact of the Japanese designers on the minimalism movement was substantial; they provided a politically relevant alternative to the glitz and glamour of the decade and revolutionized the way we view clothes once and for all.
Renowned for her desire to push the boundaries of wearability and challenge modern perceptions of femininity, REI KAWAKUBO (Comme de Garçons) in 1997 created the collection, entitled “Body Meets Dress, Dress Meets Body”, that challenged traditional perceptions of the female body, often sexualized in Western cultures.
While fashion in the 1980s was divided between the so-called bourgeois and the avant-garde, two very different types of minimalism emerged. The large designer houses, such as Donna Karan and Armani, opted for chic and clean purism, while emerging designers and smaller labels continued by moving minimalism into a more conceptual direction. The next stage of minimalism was born: deconstructionism. Reducing the garment to its most fundamental parts would be the most basic understanding of the concept. And its pioneer? One and only, Martin Margiela.
Maison Martin Margiela became known for its definitive deconstruction and transformation techniques, where volumes are reinvented, shapes are modified, and garments’ original use and movement are playfully turned on their heads. Margiela’s vision was always to maintain the focus on the clothes. As fashion became more concerned with labels and branding, his work became even more relevant, not only for its technical brilliance and new take on feminine elegance but also for its anti-fashion values and anti-status symbolism.
The anonymity of the design and of the designer himself was key to MAISON MARGIELA’s aesthetic. The designer decided to remain anonymous throughout his whole career and refused to give interviews or take a bow at the end of his shows. He also often sent models down the catwalk with covered faces or walking backwards to keep the attention on the clothes.
CALVIN KLEIN ss 1994 / photo source
While avant-garde designers had already embraced “power dressing” and resorted to minimalism, mainstream fashion followed in the late 1980s and 1990s, with American designers like Donna Karan and Calvin Klein taking the lead. Design directives: comfort, ease, and practicality for modern working women. So-called post-minimalism was a far cry from the power look of the previous decade, and unlike the European (Maison Martin Margiela, Ann Demeulemeester, Helmut Lang) and Japanese (Comme des Garcons, Issey Miyake) versions of minimalism of the 1990s, it focused more than ever on the female body than on the clothes themselves.
HUSSEIN CHALAYAN s/s 1998: Chalayan re-evaluated traditional womenswear by playing with proportions and reducing clothes to bare minimum. / photo source
In the late 1990s, there again arose an attachment to adroginity. Hussein Chalayan’s intellectual, scientific approach to fashion brought a transfomative and futuristic aspect to minimalism that was more concerned with what the body can achieve than how it looks.
HAIDER ACKERMANN: Fluid, draped shapes in satin, silk and leather are distinctive of Ackermann’s minimalism. / photo source 1 & 2
And minimalism today? In 2007, it became increasingly evident that the financial system was becoming unstable, a crash was unavoidable, and fashion buying habits were ready to change again. While minimalism in the past was always connected to various social, political, and cultural shifts, the movement of the 21st century is more impacted by economics. We have less money to spend on clothing and want to spend it on pieces that won’t be outdated by next season, and looking at these photos, it simply seems that minimal pieces always stay contemporary. We are also more concerned with ethical aspects of fashion as well as environmental issues such as the use of natural resources, waste, and pollution. Minimalism became a responsible way of fashion consumption and aesthetics that pervades the current fashion consciousness, with designers such as Stella McCartney, Phoebe Philo for Celine, Haider Ackermann, or high-street brands such as COS and Uniqlo leading the way.
THE ROW ss 2017 / photo source
STELLA MCCARTNEY ss 2017 / photo source
CELINE aw 2016 / photo source
Written by Sandra Gubenšek
There is more:
/ 10 steps to becoming more mindful fashion consumer
/ Freedom in Limitation: An Exploration of the White Shirt
/ Editorial note: And who made your clothes?
Subscribe & receive 15% off your first order!
Subscribe to our newsletter to instantly receive 15% off your first order and be the first to discover emerging designers, new arrivals, special offers and cool stuff like that!
Shop our selection of minimalist fashion:
Dot Ring – Silver or 14k Gold
65.00€ – 215.00€Elongated Shirt – Black
319.00€Asymmetric Shirt
289.00€Chruse Dress
190.00€Mini Fermata Bag – Red
445.00€Pleated Shorts
225.00€Shirt no. 15
150.00€Draped Jersey Top – Naturally dyed
257.00€Pleated Twill Trousers
267.00€Tunic no. 1
186.00€Shirt no. 3
113.00€Shirt no. 16
141.00€Mini Fermata Bag – Black
445.00€Original price was: 445.00€.334.00€Current price is: 334.00€.Sleeveless Shirt – White
194.00€Dress no. 9
196.00€Bar Earring – Silver or 14k Gold
32.00€ – 155.00€Draped One Shoulder Top – Naturally dyed
257.00€Elongated Sleeveless Shirt – Black
240.00€Share this:
Related Posts
A Letter From Our CEO
Share this:
New & Now: Spring at Utopiast
Share this:
Introducing: Janja Videc
Share this:
Milano Design Week: Utopiast Favourites
Share this: